History of Shakya's
The
Shakyas were settled in the territory bounded by the Himalayas in the north
Nepal, The Rohini (the present-day Kobana, a tributory of the Rapti) in the
east and the Rapti in the south. Some Buddhist texts, Mahāvastu, Mahavamsa and Sumangalavilasini give
accounts of the Śhākyas.[2]
Indologist
Michael Witzel has suggested that the similarity of the name Śhākya and Śaka
(the Indian and Persian name for the Scythians) is no coincidence. He thinks
the Śhākyas were "an early incursion of the Scythians" into India
Nepal. [5] The Shākyas appear to have retained
features that have other Indic or Vedic precedent such as burial mounds
(stūpas), which are referred to in the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa as
"demonic" (ŚB 12.8.1.5), and are similar to the Kurgan mounds in
Central Asia. Witzel has also suggested, informally, that the idea of being
judged on the basis of your actions in life comes into India from
Zoroastrianism. Certainly karma has no Vedic precedent, and Johannes Bronkhorst
has argued that Brahmins were assimilating the idea of karma from Another
possible connection with Iran is the division of the person into Body speech
and mind by Buddhists, which has no Vedic precedent but is prominent in
Zoroastrianism. [6] However by the time we know of them the
Śhākyas have been thoroughly Indianised.
The
Shākyas were one of a number of small tribes—Kāmāla, Malla, Vṛiji, Lichchavi,
etc—who do not appear in the Ṛgveda. Pāṇini (ca 5th century BCE) knows the
Mallas and Vṛiji as desert tribes in Rajasthan, and Alexander's ambassadors met
a tribe called Malloi in the same region. They appear to have enter India from
the west Nepal some time after the Vedas were completed (ca. 1000 BCE) and then
migrated east well before the time of the Buddha (ca. 480-400 BCE). An abrupt
climate change ca. 850 BCE caused Western India to have an arid period which
may have been what set off the migration. This also coincides with a moist period
on the Central Asia Steppes and a massive expansion of the Sycthian culture
from the region of Tuva westwards to the Black Sea. [7]
By
the time of the Buddha the Śhākya nation had been subsumed into the Kingdom of Kapilvastu
at that time call republic of Shakya
The accounts of
Buddhist texts
In
several places in the Pāli Canon, including the Ambaṭṭha Sutta (D.i.92),
the progenitors of the Śhākyas are related to King Okkāka. Pāli Okkāka is identified
with the Sanskrit Ikṣvāku, who is known from Purāṇic stories, and in Jainism he
is an ancestor to all of the Tirthaṅkaras. The king banishes his elder brothers
from his kingdom and they make their home on the slopes of the Himalayas. But
they can find no one suitable to marry, so they take their own sisters as
wives, and these incestuous relationships give birth to the Śhākyas. Given the
prejudice against incest in India society generally it is remarkable that this
detail was preserved, and this suggests that it might have a grain of truth. If
so it points to Iran "there is good evidence for this practice called xᵛaētuuadaθa,
so-called next-of-kin or close-kin marriage."[8]
The
Śhākyas are mentioned in later Buddhist texts as well including the Mahāvastu (ca.
late 2nd century BCE), Mahāvaṃsa and Sumaṅgalavilāsinī (ca. 5th century CE),
mostly in the accounts of the birth of the Buddha, as a part of the Adichchabandhus
(kinsmen of the sun)[2] or the Ādichchas (solar race) and as
descendants of the legendary king Ikṣvāku (Pāli: Okkāka)
There lived once upon a time a king
of the Śhākya, a scion of the solar race, whose name was Śhuddhodana.
He was pure in conduct, and beloved of the Śhākya like the autumn moon. He had
a wife, splendid, beautiful, and steadfast, who was called the Great Māyā, from her resemblance to Māyā the Goddess.
—Buddhacarita of Aśwhoghoṣh,
I.1-2
The
Buddhist text Mahavamsa (II, 1-24), traces the origin of the Shakyas
(Śākyas) to king Okkaka (Ikshvaku) and gives their genealogy from Mahasammata,
an ancestor of Okkaka. This list comprises the names of a number of prominent
kings of the Ikshvaku dynasty,
which include Mandhata and Sagara.[2] According to this text, Okkamukha was
the eldest son of Okkaka. Sivisamjaya and Sihassara were the son and grandson
of Okkamukha. King Sihassara had eighty-two thousand sons and grandsons, who
were together known as the Shakyas. The youngest son of Sihassara was Jayasen.
Jayasen had a son, Sihahanu, and a daughter, Yashodhara (not to be confused
with prince Siddhartha's wife), who was married to Devadahasakka. Devadahasakka
had two daughters, Anjana and Kaccana. Sihahanu married Kaccana, and they had
five sons and two daughters, Suddhodana was one of them. Suddhodana had two
queens, MahaMaya and Prajapati, both daughters of Anjana. Siddhartha (Gautama
Buddha) was the son of King Shuddhodana and MahaMaya. Rahul was the son of Shiddhartha
and Yashodara (also known as Bhaddakachchana),
daughter of Suppabuddha and granddaughter of Anjana.[4][9]
Shakya administration
According
to the Mahavastu and the Lalitavistara, the seat of the Shakya
administration was the saṃsthāgāra (Pali:santhāgāra) (assembly hall) at Kapilavastu. A
new building for the Shakya samsthagara was constructed at the time of Gautama
Buddha, which was inaugurated by him. The highest administrative authority was
the Shakya Parishad, comprising 500 members, which met in the
samsthagara to transact any important business. The Shakya Parishad was
headed by an elected King, who presided over the meetings.[2]
Annexation by Kosala
Viḍdūḍabh,
the son of Pasenadi and Vāsavakhattiyā, the daughter of a Śhākya
named Mahānāma by a slave girl ascended the throne of Kosala after overthrowing his father. As an act of vengeance
for cheating Kosala by sending his mother, the daughter of a slave woman for
marriage to his father, he invaded the Śhākya territory, massacred them and
annexed it.[
No comments:
Post a Comment